If a dog wears pants would the pants have 4 holes or 2 holes? Well, in my idea there should be 4 holes, for 2 reasons.
First, the meaning of the word “Pants” is clothing worn by humans under other clothings. However if there are 2 holes, the pants don’t cover the whole under of the dog, it covers only one side, and it does not match the definition wroten on the dictionary. Should pants that do not fit the dictionary’s definition be called pants? I believe no. Secondly, if there are 4 holes in the pants dogs would be more easier to move. Dogs are very active animals, and they need to move a lot. However if there are two holes, the pants will be more likely to flow down while they move. But if there are 4 holes of course it might flow down, but it won’t be more likely than having 2 holes. I especially know that very much because my friend had once made her dog pants, and there were 2 holes, but when we went out for a short walk with those two holed pants, when her dog started to slowly run, step by step, the pants started to flow down, like a melting snowman of the spring. When I saw that I felt very embarrassed and funny, and learned that dogs should have 4 holes in their pants
This is why dogs should have 4 holes on their pants, not two holes. Therefore, dog clothes company owners, if they make dog pants with 2 holes they should give me 5000 dollars.
Comments